patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Would SC Voters Like a Do-Over?

Probably not, even though the streak of picking presidents is likely over.

 

In January, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was a double-digit winner in the South Carolina primary over frontrunner Mitt Romney, with Rick Santorum coming in a distant third.

At the time, it was thought that the win might be precisely the shot in the arm the struggling Gingrich campaign needed.

Instead, Gingrich has floundered, having won only his home state of Georgia in the 32 primaries and caucuses since.

His inability to capitalize on the momentum means that the South Carolina GOP’s streak of correctly picking the eventual nominee since 1980 will come to an end.

To some, the streak was evidence of the Palmetto State’s importance in the primary schedule. While others, who did not necessarily diminish the importance of the streak, continue to believe that South Carolina’s being “First in the South” is what really matters.

Regardless, the key to Gingrich’s victory here was his ability to attract the most-conservative voters in the party. Considering how Santorum subsequently lured away those voters, it would seem logical that the state’s voters might have a tinge of regret.

But for the most part, according to Gingrich supporters who talked to Patch in the past week, they don’t.

Karen Martin, who heads the Spartanburg County Tea Party, was undecided for much of the primary season, but eventually came around to Gingrich. She has always viewed Santorum as toxic because of how he is portrayed by the mainstream media.

“It has nothing to do with how qualified Santorum actually is as a candidate,” Martin said.

Martin not only does not regret her vote, she thinks Gingrich should reject calls to withdraw from the race.

“I want Newt to stay in as long as possible,” she said. “He’s keeping Romney accountable.”

Martin also wants Gingrich to stay in because he increases the likelihood of a brokered convention. “I’m still holding out hope for that," Martin said.

Lowcountry 9-12 member Dana Eiser shares Martin’s views, particularly about the possibility of a brokered convention.

"I'm still a gung-ho Newt supporter," Eiser said. "I think he's the only man for the job, he's the only one who understands how Washington works. Although he is a Washington insider, I think that's what we need to change Washington."

Romney may make it to the convention with the most delegates, but it looks more and more likely he won't have enough of them to clinch the nomination outright, and that could pave the way for what Eiser said would be a dream ticket — Santorum/Gingrich 2012.

Charleston City Councilman Aubrey Alexander, who supported Gingrich after his preferred candidate (Rick Perry) dropped out, doesn't regret his vote either.

Alexander said Gingrich continues to give voice to important issues in the campaign.

"I think the Speaker would be a formidable foe for Obama," Alexander said. "He is extremely informed and able to debate the conservative position with the President, but he doesn't seem to be able to get the support nationally."

One Santorum supporter, Jane Kizer, thinks Gingrich’s debating skills are impressive, but probably would not have made much of a difference in a race against Obama.

“Obama is not going to debate the technical issues like Gingrich wants to,” Kizer said. “He’s going to give speeches that appeal to people’s emotion and that’s what appeals to the average voter.”

Political consultant Patrick Arnold said he doesn't really hear anyone still talking about Newt Gingrich or the South Carolina primary results any more.

"It seems like for all the people in South Carolina, mum's the word," Arnold said. "But you see that a lot in these long races, nobody really wants to talk about it."

"It almost seems like talking about it is admitting you picked the wrong horse," he said. "No one wants to admit that."

It’s tempting to wonder where the GOP race would be today if Santorum had performed better in South Carolina. Ultimately, it will be seen as a detour to what became two-man race between Romney and Santorum.

LaDonna Ryggs, the Spartanburg GOP chair, believes voters were still thinking about 2008 when they chose the more moderate John McCain over Mike Huckabee. But she also thinks there was genuine feeling for Gingrich.

“He hit 40 percent of the vote,” Ryggs said. “It was not a protest vote. People liked him.”

Ryggs pointed out that Romney was the frontrunner from the start and many conservatives wanted him to be tested in the primary.

“The goal was to vet him and make him prove his conservatism,” Ryggs said. “Which is what has happened. Romney has had to tack to the right, and conservatives will always hold his feet to the fire.”

Conservative voters Patch spoke to say they will vote for Romney because he’s ultimately better than another four years of Barack Obama. But there is still a lack of passion.

As Kizer said, “Nobody is excited about Romney. He doesn’t make people want to go out and campaign and raise money for him.”

Excitement is precisely what Gingrich generated with his win in South Carolina, but the former Speaker appears destined to be but a footnote in presidential politics.

Nevertheless, Gingrich’s win here means that he will always have a spot in state political lore. And if a place in the history books isn’t enough, the $4,400 he still owes the state GOP will keep him in bank books for a little while, too.

  • Is it time to unite behind Romney?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. Romney is clearly the nominee.
        40 (52%)
    • Gingrich and Paul should concede, but Santorum is viable.
        14 (18%)
    • No. A tough race is good for the country.
        22 (28%)
    Total votes: 76
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum

Mimi

3:06 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

And this is informative information???? Guess what schemer it wouldn't matter who SC picked in the primary Obama will win hands down. So stop looking for excuses and face reality the MAJORITY OF THE COUNTRY DOESN"T AGREE WITH YOUR NONSENSE PERIOD. If you people keep supporting a party that has waged war on every single voting block and expect them to win a general election you truly are dellusional.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gretchen

10:16 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

You mean like OBAMACARE which around 50% of the people do not want? Or maybe you mean all the money OBAMA invested in GREEN ENERGY and now those companies have gone bankrupt. How about giving me some examples of what you are referring to ? EH ?

M.G. Hammock

12:26 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

What about a do over for Governor? I would support that!

Reply
Comment_arrow

reg

1:33 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

amen - I'd say do the 2010 elections all over again, staring with the primaries (since neither party got who they really wanted in many of the races)

Jim Minkler

8:29 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

I agree with all the above.Mimi and M.G. I could not have put it any better.Where is all the rednecks and there brain dead comments?

Reply

Real Thinker

12:26 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

pot...kettle...
"brain dead"...sounding uneducated when saying "where IS all the rednecks" and then capping it off with incorrect spelling of "their"...priceless.

Reply

Jim Minkler

7:18 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

I thought the trailer trash would show up .....Priceless:)

Reply

Lauren

8:43 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

why does the governor nimrata continue to operate under an assumed name?

Reply

Gretchen

10:14 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

NO ONE cares who SC elects in the Primary. It's doesn't amount to a hilll of beans !

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Shawn Drury

1:26 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Charlie, Your comment has been removed for violation of our terms of use. Please refrain from using explicit language and name-calling.

Reply

Leave a comment