patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Evangelicals Weigh Electability Vs. Ideology

As Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum battle for South Carolina's conservative vote, evangelical Christians are being forced to consider sacrificing principle for practicality

 

It's been described as a battle for the Republican Party's very soul

Everyone from the GOP leadership to foot-soldiers on the ground from Chesnee to Charleston badly want to defeat President Barack Obama in November.

But many members of a critical Palmetto State voting block — a large evangelical Christian community — aren't willing to sacrifice ideology for practicality.

They aren't yet willing to get behind frontrunner Mitt Romney, whom they don't trust for reasons ranging from his moderate voting record to his Mormon faith.

But despite belonging to the largest religious group in the state, their power play has been limited because they can't agree on which "conservative" candidate to back: Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry or Rick Santorum.

Javan Browder, a former Bachmann staffer who was the co-director of the South Carolina Tea Party Coalition, supports Santorum now, and senses that many Christians will shift toward the Santorum, as he has. 

"I think people respect Rick Santorum as a man of faith and character, though they may not agree with him on the issues 100 percent," Browder said. "To me faith and character are the most important things to consider. To me it’s about realness."

"Of course my hope was that Michele Bachmann would come out on top in Iowa and we would all rally around her, but my prayer all along had been that it would be decisive either way and that at least one conservative would come out strong."

In a survey released Thursday by the Pew Research Center's Forum on Religion and Public Life, evangelicals and Mormons shared many commonalities.

In a breakdown of the report by the Associated Press, white evangelicals and Mormons shared a commitment to family life, prayer, the Bible and conservative politics. Both groups also showed support for the Republican Party and in smaller government.

State GOP Executive Director Matt Moore told Patch in a November article titled, "Churches A Vibrant Part of S.C. Political Circuit," that religion is one of the many factors that help voters choose a candidate, but that the deciding factor is in how the candidate lives and leads.

"Certainly in a state like South Carolina, our strong evangelical community cannot be ignored," Moore said. "I've advised multiple presidential candidates to speak to those voters, and all voters, in their own voice. If you personally connect with voters, they are more likely to focus on the things you have in common, instead of the things that make you different."

Moore's remarks paint a vivid picture of what Romney has tried to do in this election year.

Romney has talked openly about the ideas that conservative Christians and Mormons share, unlike his bid for the presidential nomination in 2008 when he addressed his faith head-on, pointing out the differences in Mormonism and Christianity.

But he's not the first candidate to have to do so. In 1960, many voters were concerned John F. Kennedy, a practicing Catholic, would listen to the Pope, instead of the people.

However, Brad Atkins, president of the South Carolina Baptist Convention, worries that committed Christians may likely vote for a candidate based on his ability to turn around the economy, rather than considering the candidates' values.

Atkins believes it would be similarly unfortunate for Christians to vote based upon practicality. 

"Anytime you vote simply because of someone's realistic chance of winning, that's not a fair assessment of each candidate," Atkins said. "That's why it's so important evangelicals throughout the whole state, and people of faith, honestly pray about who they will vote for — look at all the candidates, and their total biographies, if you will. Take their history of service in office, family, faith, business."

Patch met Doris Forest of Greer at a Rick Perry event at Tommy's Ham House and she wasn't sure for whom she would cast her vote at the time, she liked Perry because of how he treated people and because of what he said.

"You can tell a lot about a person by how he treats people," Forest said. "He asked me to pray for him, not vote for him. That's what I'm here doing is to make an opinion about a person, study the situation. We need strong leadership and honesty above all else."

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich, whose campaign has reportedly had conversations with former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum about supporting him in the event he should drop out, is now beginning to pull away from Santorum in South Carolina, according to the newest poll

Still, with Santorum's status as a bonafide social conservative, some hardline evangelicals in the state will be faced with the choice on Jan. 21 whether to vote strictly on their beliefs or meld their beliefs with the politically expedient strategy that another candidate may represent a better opportunity to stop Romney's momentum. 

Dr. Oran Smith, president and CEO of the Palmetto Family Council, said that to a certain extent, there's no getting around political expediency in a political race. 

"We should never sacrifice our core principles," Smith said. "But, we must ask which hills we are willing to die on. Is it a principle or a whim? All viable candidates are more conservative than Nelson Rockefeller or Richard Nixon."

Smith surmised that Gingrich, and even a faltering Rick Perry, have enough strength in their campaigns to prevent Santorum from rallying an evangelical base in the state as cohesively as he otherwise could. That doesn't change the fact that Santorum is squarely on the map due to his unabashed faith. 

"For a number of evangelicals, particularly late-deciders who are not insiders — people who don't go to rallies or conventions or watch Fox News all day — Santorum's strong showing in Iowa put him on their radar screen really for the first time," Smith said. 

Atkins said he's still researching the candidates and praying over his own decision as an undecided voter. He also said he's not sensed any groundswell in the evangelical community to indicate a shift toward any particular candidate. 

"I think in the coming days, when all the candidates are coming down here, you'll hear more from them on a local level and on the state level, and I think a lot of South Carolinians, not just evangelicals, are still undecided at this time," Atkins said. 

David Shirley, a Taylors resident and director at the Beaverdam Baptist Association in Oconee County, said that while Santorum may strengthen because of his unwavering stance on the place of Christian values in governance, there may simply be too much fracturing within the evangelical community to pose any real threat to Romney. 

"I do see a greater possibility of Santorum being the evangelical choice, especially with (Michele) Bachmann dropping out and with Perry faltering," Shirley said. "Again, the problem will be the Christian vote being spread out among two or three candidates possibly leaving a moderate candidate, like McCain in 2008, as the winner." 

For Shirley, who has listened to Perry, Gingrich and Bachmann speak in person, the question of practicality or ideology is really no question at all. He believes conservative America's rigorous attempt to foresee who may fare better against Obama didn't serve the country well nearly four years ago. 

"As I stated, the conservative vote in 2008 was split, paving the way for a McCain victory. While the talking heads on TV and the various polls tell us which candidate they believe has the best chance of defeating President Obama in November, that has no bearing on me as a Christian casting my ballot," Shirley said. "I cast my ballot for the candidate whose policies line up with my Christian values."

If Santorum is to compete with Gingrich for the anti-Romney vote in South Carolina, he will have to convince evangelicals that he not only best represents their values, but is the most likely to carry those values all the way to the White House. 

Related Topics: Christian vote, Newt Gingrich, Politics, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, SC primary, South Carolina, South Carolina Primary, and evangelical vote

Robert I. Laitres

1:20 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Most "Evangelicals" face no decision at all. They will vote how they are "told to vote" from some pulpit where their view of the world has been created for them. For, are they not doing the "work of the Lord"? What does it matter to them what they do to others in the process as they are busy "saving souls". That is not their own "soul" is of no concern to them. What does it matter if they they have to "rip out" the "soul" of others if they can use them as chits to buy access to some heaven for "themselves"? Their rationale is so pathetic as to make even the semi-literate cringe in horror.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jon

4:26 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

It seems to me you're cringing in horror.

Comment_arrow

Josie

10:01 pm on Saturday, January 14, 2012

What on earth are you saying? I'm sorry but your comment makes absolutely no sense. Seems "you" are quite confused in many ways.

Rob rRoberts

2:59 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

How anyone that votes for Santorum can call themselves a Christian is beyond me. For Santorum to want to cancel food stamps during an economic depression is beyond me. Doesn't he know people get food stamps so they and their children can EAT? Its not like we are sending people on tax-paid trips to Hawaii. Well I hope Rick with his Senate pension and health care never has to worry about feeding himself or his family. And I hope his wife never needs another late-term abortion to save her life, as Rick would ban these in all cases including rape and incest.

Reply

Sara DeVine

5:25 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Evangelicals asked God for a king. He gave them the House of Neocon.

Reply

Pace

6:28 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Ron Paul is the only evangelical candidate. Santorum is Catholic and so is Gringrich. Ron Paul is surging in the new polls. Why isn't there any mention of him? In the latest poll he also ranked higher in any other candidate to beat Obama. This is because he can pick up the young vote and the Independent vote.

Reply

Mark Harding

7:31 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

I really think this group of so called evangelicals ought forget about hedging their bets and decide with principles.
With further examination evangelical Christians might see that the constitution is actually designed to accommodate the free expression of our faith. The current state of the union is as an antagonizer of one group toward another one over the other, it was never meant to be in that roll domestically or internationally.
Ron Paul polls equal to Romney against Obama. If the evangelicals would unite behind his message of liberty I believe the United States of America could once again be the light in the wilderness to those that would seek the Lord.
Paul is a born again Christian, a Baptist and the only protestant in the field. He is the only choice for Evangelical Christians.
Revelation 3:16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of my mouth.

Reply

Mark Harding

7:31 pm on Friday, January 13, 2012

Ron Paul is the only candidate not to drop the religion card but does base his policies on biblical principles and the constitution. Sound money, end deficit financing, will overturn Roe v. Wade, not attack its enemies without provocation, and get the government out of the marriage business and leave that to the churches.
And Israel, well his plan supports Israel better than the current administration as well as Bush/Clinton. Paul's plan to end all foreign aid will actually be a benefit to Israel as at this time we give more than 8 times the aid to Israel's enemies. Some of that money eventually ends up buying arms from Iran which are turned against Israel and our troops.
As far as Iran, they are in no way able to cause major harm to Israel. Israel has for more military assets (300 nukes to none) than Iran (it's ridiculous to consider that Iran will destroy Israel). Israel just knocked off another nuke scientist yesterday so I think they have that situation under control. You don't see Israel complaining to the IAEA about Iran’s nukes.
I always thought the difference in Christianity is that Salvation in Christ only comes to living souls. And year after year we go to Afghanistan, Iraq, and African among other places and 10s of thousands of innocent men women and children die with no hope of salvation, their only crime being Muslim.

Reply

Ann

7:35 am on Saturday, January 14, 2012

Is anyone actually checking Rick Perry's record as a 3-term gov? Has anyone actually gone to rickperry.org and reviewed his cut-balance & grow plan. He's been doing this in TX for years sucessfully and just now the other candidates are catching on to his ideas and claiming them. Look at his up-bringing and his current family life. Tells you a ton about a person. And finally, look into the eyes. They are the window to the soul and this man has a huge soul. Ron Paul? Just received his massive brochure of everything he's going to do. He must be planning to be dictator to think he's going to wipe out EVERYTHING in government. This is a man who has been in Congress for 12 terms and only gotten one minor bill passed. And he states he's only going to take a salary of $39,000 as president. Why isn't he doing that now? All this big talk sounds good, but have they walked the walk and talked the talk. PERRY HAS!

Reply

stanley seigler

1:14 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

@Andrew Moore: "...from Chesnee to Charleston badly want to defeat President Barack Obama..."

WHY? ...

the Evangelicals should consider the following teachings of Jesus:

"Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's"

sounds like separation of church and state

"But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

sounds like not advertising your beliefs...

BTW most of the founding fathers were deists ... not christians...read jefferson's bible.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tonto

10:25 am on Sunday, January 15, 2012

Why? they don't like communism and the DNC don't want NOBODY bringing up Oblamers religion again :)

Leave a comment